1 Plus 1 Equals 11.com
The Wisdom of Synergy
One plus One equals Eleven

The Synergistic Equation

The Power of Two
How it applies to team building,
better known today as networking,
the source of multiple butterfly effects.*

Attention Movers and Shakers
Corporate Executives, Managers and Elected Officials

Synergistic Equation: 1 plus 1 equals 11.
When this equation is applied, the 'me' perspective
morphs into the universal 'we' condition. The result is
that every effort happens exponentially for the common
good, i.e., teamwork within the group trumps working alone.

*The Butterfly Effect


The Law of Sensitive Dependence on Initial Conditions

Butterfly Effect: Metaphor for the existence of seemingly insignificant
moments that alter history and shape destinies. Unrecognized at first,
they create threads of cause and effect that appear obvious in retrospect,
changing the course of a human life or rippling through the global economy.

NOTE: In1963, Edward Lorenz theorized that a butterfly might flap its wings, moving molecules of air into motion that in turn moved other molecules of air, eventually becoming able to shift weather patterns on the other side of the world. Commonly called The Butterfly Effect, it has been granted the status of a law. The Law Of Sensitive Dependence Upon Initial Conditions. Source.

As a team facilitator, ask your associates-constituents for feedback and answers, first.

See Guidelines For Community Facilitators.

See Attributes of Agents of Change.

See Butterfly Effect Explained.


The Wisdom of Synergy
Working together within the group trumps working alone.


The Wisdom of The Group
By James Surowiecki

"Service is the answer. What is the question?” -- Hari Kaur Bird

When solving problems, your group is often smarter than the smartest people within it... If you want the best answers possible, you shouldn’t "chase the expert". Ask your subordinates. This is what makes a democracy work well.

When ABC decided to resurrect Super Millionaire - its high-powered version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire - and make it the centerpiece of its late-May schedule, what got attention were the show’s surprisingly high ratings, its bigger prizes (contestants can win $10 million), and even the return of Regis Philbin to prime-time TV.

But no one paid any attention to the show’s studio audience. That’s not surprising. Game-show audiences are usually just wallpaper, there to applaud the contestants and laugh dutifully at the host’s bad jokes.

The Millionaire audience is different, however. It’s the secret star of the show.

Hard as it may be to believe, this has potentially serious implications for the way all of us go about making decisions and solving problems.

To understand why, you need to understand the central gimmick of Millionaire, which is that when contestants get stumped by a question; they can get help in a variety of ways.

Among them, they can place a call to one of five friends or relatives, people that they have designated before the show as experts in particular fields, and ask them for the right answer.

Contestants can also poll the studio audience, which immediately casts its votes by computer. Everything we think we know about intelligence suggests that the "experts" did OK, offering the right answer - under pressure - almost 65% of the time.

They paled in comparison to the audiences. Those random groups of people with nothing better to do on a weekday afternoon than sit in a TV studio picked the right answer 91% of the time.

The judgment of the Millionaire group, in other words, has been almost perfect.

This is not a quirk or a function of the kinds of questions Millionaire asks.

Instead, the intelligence of the audience is an example of a principle that I call the wisdom of groups.

Under the right circumstances, it turns out, groups are remarkably intelligent. In fact, they’re often smarter than the smartest people within them are.

On problems ranging from the simple to the very complex, groups are able to offer collectively smart answers even when most of the people within them are not exceptionally well informed.

This idea seems so counterintuitive as to be absurd. Most of us, whether as voters or investors or consumers or managers, think valuable knowledge is concentrated in very few hands or, rather, in very few heads.

See our sister site OneAndOneEqualsEleven.com. Also see Butterfly Effect Explained. See Networking Secrets. See Why Are You Losing Good Employees? See Boss vs. Leader and Tips For Running Meetings. See One Is The Answer What Is The Question?

Strength in Unity

No two of these rings are linked, yet the 3 together are inseparable.
If any one of these 3 links is broken, the other two come apart.
This is the symbol for strength in unity.

Consider New Assumptions

"Polar Equivalency: Big change begets big resistance. Small change begets
small resistance. No change begets no resistance." -- The Exponential Age

"Any system of human organization that does not (or cannot) respect and
value counter-opinions or dissenting voices can never be truly unified and
it will never evolve intelligently. Why is this so? Because the dominant,
prevailing viewpoint will always be required to meet and to deal with its
polarity. Polarity is a law of reality...A fixed system, a "one-way" dominant
process of governance, will always 'miss' or misunderstand the emerging reality that we
call the Necessity that will become the next Mother of Invention." -- Krishna Singh Khalsa

We think smart people are easy to recognize and identify. As a result, we assume that the key to solving problems or making good decisions is finding that one, right person who will have the answer.

Success in business or in government, we imagine, is not a matter of building a collectively intelligent organization, but a matter of finding a few right people and stepping aside to let them make the tough decisions.

Yet all the evidence suggests that none of these assumptions is true. If you want the best answers possible, you shouldn’t "chase the expert."

You should ask the group.

The simplest example of the wisdom of groups is the classic jelly beans in-a-jar experiment, in which the group’s estimate of how many beans are in the jar is routinely within 2 percent or 3 percent of the right number and is always better than the vast majority of individual guesses.

Or take sports betting, where the group’s judgment is next to impossible to beat and surprisingly good at anticipating outcomes. At the racetrack, for instance, the final odds on a race reliably predict the race’s order of finish - that is, the favorite wins most often, the horse with the second-best odds wins second most often and so on - and also uncannily predict, how likely it is that a horse will win.

Group-think In Action

"Those who shall not learn to obey
shall never be in a position to command."

"If you cannot walk together, you
cannot work together." Yogi Bhajan

"The business leader must command, while the
governmental leader must persuade." Hari S. Bird

The recent Kentucky Derby, in fact, offered an excellent example of the wisdom of groups in action. The horse Smarty Jones was scorned by professional handicappers and experts. In fact, of 20 experts surveyed by the Daily Racing Form, only one picked Smarty Jones to win. But average bettors loved him, and so he went off as a 4-to-1 favorite. He won the race going away, vindicating the group’s judgment and leaving handicappers to wonder what went wrong.

Another recent bit of news - Internet search engine Google’s announcement that it will soon go public - similarly testified to the virtues of collective decision-making. Google has become a massive success because of one thing: It consistently does an exceptional job of finding the information you’re looking for - in about a tenth of a second, no less. And it does this, ultimately, by following the crowd-group.

Google’s technology is obviously sophisticated. At its core is a democratic approach to searching the Web. Essentially, Google asks Web-page producers to vote, on which pages are most valuable, by treating each link to a Web page as a vote. Those pages that get the most votes are more likely to end up high on the list. Not coincidentally, they’re also usually the pages that have the information you’re seeking.

Stock Market Advice

The wisdom of the group is even at work in the stock market - at last most of the time. Even though markets are often fickle and skittish, they still do a better job of uncovering and aggregating information than most individuals do.

That’s why, over time, only a miniscule minority of professional money managers does better than the market as a whole, which in turn is why just about all of us would be better off putting our money into an index fund rather than entrusting it to a broker or a mutual fund manager.

There may be a few professional investors, such as Warren Buffett, whose vision of the future is clearer than the market’s, but they are rare.

None of this means that smart people are irrelevant or that groups can make good decisions on the basis of bad information. It does mean that we assume too easily that we know what good information looks like and that we know where intelligence resides.

Random Guesses vs. Experts

Expertise is invaluable, but individual experts’ records as forecasters have been consistently dismal. Studies have shown that most experts are no better at forecasting the future than mechanical models or random guesses are. Their record doesn’t get better as the questions get more important.

Consider the CIA’s failure to anticipate the demise of the Soviet Union or the insistence of its former director, George Tenet, that the case for proving that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was a "slam dunk."

Forecasting is, of course, tremendously difficult, and tapping into a group’s collective intelligence does not guarantee right answers. It just guarantees that you’ll consistently get a better answer. That’s why companies and organizations of all stripes - including the US intelligence community - should be thinking about ways to break down traditional decision-making hierarchies, in which the people at the top have all the authority, and allow the group, as it were, to speak.

The problems at which collective wisdom excels are those that have definitive answers or that requires a sense of how likely something is to happen. These are also the problems that most organizations face.

The Myth of the Visionary

Unfortunately, acknowledging the wisdom of the group would force people at the top of hierarchies to give up some authority and power, and to acknowledge that their own judgment might be less than perfect. That’s not an easy thing for managers to do, especially when, as a culture, we have so much invested in the myth of the genius or the visionary.

Still, good group decision-making doesn’t require people to give up or water down their own beliefs. On the contrary, groups are only smart when everyone in them is acting as independently as possible. The wisdom of groups is not the product of compromise and consensus. Instead, it happens when all those individual, independent judgments are summed up, just as a market price sums up the opinions of all the traders in a market or Google’s rankings reflect the input of Web-page owners everywhere.

Diverse Groups Answer Best

Along with independence, groups should be kept as diverse as possible. Diversity here really means diversity of opinions and information. With things such as the Millionaire audience, the gaggle of Web-page producers of the group of bettors at the track, you don’t have to worry as much about diversity, because these groups are diverse - in information, opinion and attitude - to begin with.

Especially within, companies or government agencies, it’s a perennial problem. Governments are most likely to make good decisions about policy and execution when they’re populated with people who aren’t expected to toe a certain line.

The more politically homogeneous a government becomes, the less likely its decisions will be genuinely wise. The same is true of many corporations, in which where executives’ penchant for hiring people who look and think like them is not a recipe for success.

What we don’t want are groups whose members fall in lockstep behind the commands of their leaders, or in which group think keeps valuable alternatives from consideration.

Putting Pieces Together

Groups are wise when pieces of information, no matter how small, are pulled together from as many places as possible.

A classic example of this happened in the wake of the 1986 Challenger disaster, when the stock market, in the space of roughly an hour, figured out that Morton Thiokol, which had made the space shuttle’s solid fuel booster, was responsible for the catastrophe.

The market did this even though most of the investors had only small bits of information, if any. But somehow when all those bits were added up, the picture of the world the group had in its collective brain was complete. Even when most people know only a little about a question, it turns out, it’s possible for the group to know it all. Synergistically, 1 plus 1 truly equals more than 2. 1 Plus 1 Equals 11. See Code of Ethics. (BTW: We welcome your feedback.) --

The Synergistic Equation

1 + 1 = 11

By Ilya Pozin

Transactional leaders focus on the role of supervision, organization,
and group performance. They are concerned with the status quo and
day-to-day progress toward goals. Transformational leaders work
to enhance the motivation and engagement of followers
by directing their behavior toward a shared vision.

It's time to face the music as a manager: You don’t always have all of the right answers. Your “it’s my way or the highway” approach to management isn’t going to encourage anyone to help you in your problem solving endeavors.

Leaders and Managers are often referred to synonymously, but only Leaders allow their employees to solve problems with their own insight. The truth of the matter is this: Every Leader may not be a Manager, but every Manager should be a Leader. It’s easy to see that leadership and management aren’t the same thing, but a Manager who lacks effective leadership traits will drive a business into the ground faster than you can count to 10.

Change doesn’t happen overnight when it comes to transforming managers into leaders. It takes time and energy to improve the way you manage and utilize more leadership characteristics on a daily basis.

Here are some tips to help you make the necessary improvements:

.) Managers give answers, Leaders ask questions. There’s nothing certain to turn your employees against you faster than shouting orders at them. Why not spare yourself the impending resentment and simply ask your employees this: “What would you do?” or “What do you think of this idea?” Allowing people to participate in the decision-making process will not only transform what could have been an order into something more easily swallowed--it also inspires creativity, motivation, and autonomy.

.) Managers criticize mistakes, Leaders call attention to mistakes indirectly. It may seem more efficient to point out your employees’ mistakes directly, but this will only leave them feeling embarrassed and frustrated. You should really be giving them the chance to learn and grow from through your critiques. Instead, give your employees the chance to address their mistakes.

For example, say a project was sent to a client and you receive back a disgruntled message. Calmly ask your employee about the clients concern and whether they feel what was provided was on par. This will give them a chance to provide their input, while also improving for the future.

.) Managers forget to praise, Leaders reward even the smallest improvement. Praise pays off when it comes to increasing the overall success of your company. Finding time to recognize your employees for even the smallest accomplishment will only increase their interest in what they do. If you’re interested in ensuring your employees take pride in all that they do, regular feedback and recognition is certain to do the trick. Everyone wants to be genuinely appreciated for their efforts.

.) Managers focus on the bad, Leaders emphasize the good. This really comes down to seeing the cup half empty or half full. If you’re only willing to point out the flaws of a project or an employee, you’re not giving them much interest in learning or improving. Instead, create a sandwich effect. Start with some form of praise, follow with the criticism, and end with praise.

.) Managers want credit, Leaders credit their teams. Managers who lack leadership abilities are always first to take credit. But effective leaders understand the importance of crediting their teams for the big wins. This pays off in the long run for creative a workplace with a more positive company culture and employees who are driven toward more successes as a team.

Management should not be approached through force, but rather through influence. Put these techniques in place to improve the way your employees perform.

Do you ask questions instead of giving answers? --

About Ilya Pozin

Founder of Ciplex. Columnist for Inc, Forbes and LinkedIn. Gadget lover, investor, mentor, husband, father, and '30 Under 30' entrepreneur.

One Is The Answer What Is The Question

Guidelines For Community Facilitators

Conscious Communication Guidelines

The Case For Robert's Rules of Order

The Case For Movers and Shakers

Marines Transform Me Into We

Get Robert's Rules of Order

All For One, Won For All

Courageous Dialogues

Masculine Moments

Diversity Dialogues

Networking Secrets

1 Plus 1 Equals 11

Code of Ethics



More Web sites by

SAAAP.org Dieterata.com
AllIsOne.guru HariSingh.com
TheISites.com SikhTribes.com
SopaSeca.com SikhSongs.com
UbuntuAge.com WaheGuru.guru
UntoInfinity.com NarayanOil.com
LeftOfMaya.com SikhsShine.com
EyesOnPies.com Turbanators.com
SikhAnthem.com IsolatedSeer.com
BroadPoints.com 13EkOngKar.com
Obama43To1.com SoothingSpa.com
HariKaurBird.com ChardeeKala.com
OpticalViews.com 2020ForEyes.com
KhalsaVision.com SPIRITofGRD.com
GuruRamDas.com LakeKillarney.com
DualityOptics.com HariSinghBird.com
Interior-Guard.com SatKartarSingh.com
OpticalCourse.com DrRamonIbarra.com
MiriPiriWarrior.com FitItAndForgetIt.com
1IsTheAnswer.com OpticianryToday.com
SatNamMeans.com WordPhysiology.com
KaliYugaSigns.com JustAddedWater.com
SiriSinghSahib.com EyewearMoodys.com
1And1Equals11.com PreetKaurKhalsa.com
CloseOrderDrill.com WhiteTantraYoga.com
RamDhanSingh.com 3HOLegacyLinks.com
2020ForWomen.com TheMahanTantric.com
HangupsByHari.com SiriMantraForLife.com
ACTForDiversity.com OpticianryReview.com
AdiShaktiMantra.com 2020ForOpticians.com
ScienceOfMudra.com OpticalGuidelines.com
OneIsTheAnswer.com GuruGobindSingh.com
ScienceOfMantra.com OpticalWorkshops.com
GuruGaitriMantra.com KirpalSinghKhalsa.com
OohRahMemorial.com SimranKaurKhalsa.com
AkalCommittee13.com SadhanaGuidelines.com
GurdwaraSecurity.com YouAreTheEssence.com
AmarSinghKhalsa.com KundaliniYogapedia.com
DiversityDialogues.org StFrancisOfficePark.com
SensitivitySummit.com ToTheSweetestMom.com
AwtarSinghKhalsa.com YogiBhajansTeacher.com
SurvivalCampUSA.com OpticalShiftHappens.com
KhalsaWebMasters.com AllForOneWonForAll.com
MasculineMoments.com DrinkingDrivingDead.com
AhaMomentOfTruth.com MyInterviewWithGod.com
HairInLaysTheTruth.com SaTaNaMaMeditation.com
PartnersNotParents.com FaceBlindnessIsReal.com
ToTheSweetestWife.com ToServeIsToSucceed.com
EachMomentIsAGift.com ServingVersusSelling.com
SikhAndYeShallFind.com SukhmaniKaurKhalsa.com
OpticiansForChange.com LakesideManorOnline.com
HappinessIsTheRule.com EyeWearProfessionals.com
AtTheFeetOfTheYogi.com SecurityAdvisoryTeam.com
SiriGuruGranthSahib.guru ReligionDemographics.com
RaMaDaSaMeditation.com TimeForCraftsmanship.com
UniversityOfDiversity.com FirstSikhOfSikhDharma.com
DispensingGuidelines.com HealthEqualsHappiness.com
CourageousDialogues.com GoodGuysWearTurbans.com
SatKriyaByYogiBhajan.com AquarianAgeBeganHere.com
IfYouKnowWhoYouAre.com ButterflyEffectExplained.com
EyeExaminationOnline.com FirstTeachersAreWomen.com
GlassesOnlineWarning.com SugarIsAFourLetterWord.com
IDoNotEatDeadAnimals.com SikhWomenWearTurbans.com
MoreThanYouCanKnow.com WomenWimpsOrWarriors.com
OpticiansForThePeople.com CosmicCyclesAndCircles.com
OnsiteFamilyHealthcare.com TheAfterDeathExperience.com
SantSipahiAdvisoryTeam.com IAmABornAgainAmerican.com
KirtanKriyaByYogiBhajan.com TestYourKnowledgeOnline.com
SatHanumanSinghKhalsa.com LifeAccordingToYogiBhajan.com
TextingAndDrivingIsCrazy.com NowYouKnowThatYouKnow.com
ItsAllAboutMeNotAboutYou.com KundaliniYogaByYogiBhajan.com
CrucifixionByAnEyewitness.com EndOfPrideAndPrejudiceIsNigh.com
GodAndMeMeAndGodAreOne.com EkOngKarSatNamSiriWaheGuru.com
ReachOutAndTouchSomebody.com TheTechnologyOfConsciousness.com
ConsciousCommunicationGuidelines.com OneIsTheAnswerWhatIsTheQuestion.com

© All rights reserved.